Closed Thread
Page 8 of 12 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 LastLast
Results 106 to 120 of 181

Thread: SWGEmu AGPL Instructions and Requirements

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    SWGEmu Retired Forum Moderator Ellyssia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    I'm around
    Posts
    4,045
    Play Stats
    Inactive
    Quote Originally Posted by Thrax989 View Post
    They use engine 5 we are only getting engine 3 unlocked they will still be better then all of the other private servers.
    Not to mention about 25 percent of that engine is mission in engine 3 compared to the engine 5 that is fully loaded with things missing in the engine 3 I was already told this and was confirmed.

    Id rather have engine 5 then this unlocked engine 3 to be honest .

    Correct me if im wrong bask and nova use engine 5. The dev environment uses engine 3. Private servers users use engine 3 . Unlocked new engine will be engine core 3 engine 3 unlocked not 4 or 5 ...

    they still have the upper hand and always will with engine 4 and engine 5 that they are currently using that will not ever go to any of us since its closed source .
    Think you misunderstood Oru... he said they were discussing using Engine 5, not that we are at this time.
    Ellyssia
    Forum Moderator

    SWGEmu is a non-profit, open source community project.
    How to report bugs | Mantis (Bug Tracker) | Live Support
    Install SWGEmu | Fix SWGEmu | Submit a ticket

  2. #2
    Retired Lead Developer
    Join Date
    Dec 1970
    Posts
    767
    Play Stats
    Inactive
    Quote Originally Posted by Thrax989 View Post
    They use engine 5 we are only getting engine 3 unlocked they will still be better then all of the other private servers.
    Not to mention about 25 percent of that engine is mission in engine 3 compared to the engine 5 that is fully loaded with things missing in the engine 3 I was already told this and was confirmed.

    Id rather have engine 5 then this unlocked engine 3 to be honest .

    Correct me if im wrong bask and nova use engine 5. The dev environment uses engine 3. Private servers users use engine 3 . Unlocked new engine will be engine core 3 engine 3 unlocked not 4 or 5 ...

    they still have the upper hand and always will with engine 4 and engine 5 that they are currently using that will not ever go to any of us since its closed source .
    engine5 is not a drop-in replacement of engine3. To use engine5 core3 would need substantial patching(weeks/months of work), and that is what Oru was trying to say.
    Bas is using engine3, nova is using engine3 like the rest of the development team and servers.

    theanswer@swgemu.com | www.swgemu.com
    SWGEmu is a non-profit, open source community project.
    SWGEmu FAQ | Install SWGEmu | Report Bugs

  3. #3
    Junior Member Aso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    75
    Play Stats
    Inactive
    Quote Originally Posted by TheAnswer View Post
    engine5 is not a drop-in replacement of engine3. To use engine5 core3 would need substantial patching(weeks/months of work), and that is what Oru was trying to say.
    Bas is using engine3, nova is using engine3 like the rest of the development team and servers.
    Yes, that's the way I understood it.

    Engine 5 is being used in commercial ventures, while Engine 3 is being used here.

    Looking forward, as I'm sure many are, to an engine that is not restricted in any way.

  4. #4
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    1
    Play Stats
    Inactive
    Really hope the 2.5 hours reset is removed soon so groups actually manage to complete high end stuff at present my buffs last longer than my group!

  5. #5
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    1
    Play Stats
    Inactive
    That 2.5 hour reset kills my flow, kills my groups, kills my gameplay, and kills my mood. It is a total killer, like thinking about your grandmother in a bikini when you are about to kiss the hottest woman on earth. Not that I know what that's like....

    Much love guys and gals. All of your work is highly appreciated. I would just be pleased as punch to see this thorn removed from our favorite game and community.

  6. #6
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    4
    Play Stats
    Inactive
    Thanks for the clarification. And also thank you and the team for working towards this unrestricted time release for everyone.

  7. #7
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1
    Play Stats
    Inactive
    Great job Vlas... team.. Great job on your work all those years.

    I Really wondered about those servers who were developing and not sharing, why? when you love starwars, when you love the game, the grinding.
    Why do you want to build a new server and keep the inventions to yourself? This is a great step in the right direction. I stopped playing because of my internet provider's crappy line. it's a bit better now.
    i come back see some reactions. Of course some finds the nge better, but shouldn't we first make the basic code work perfectly? together?
    I even mailed eve-online and said you have the experience to bring an old game to a new level.. please do the same with starwars galaxies.. (no answer of course , i had 10 accounts there)


    why are we playing swg? because we like it.. so please just contribute instead of the look how good i am attitude, on the other servers.
    how many servers are online with a devteam? 10? you have in total 10 devteams? that's more than a regular sofwaremanufacturer I have worked at one as a systemadministrator.
    Together we can bring starwars to the world. Alone we just fixing that what must be fixed in the future and it will take ages.

  8. #8
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    4
    Play Stats
    Inactive
    I appreciate the efforts you go to keeping people calm. I am eagerly awaiting this pushed asap. Please hurry. It has been a long time since May.

  9. #9
    Addicted Tiars's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Ironforge, Uther
    Posts
    3,833
    Play Stats
    Inactive
    We are patiently waiting but I can understand the frustration.

    But Oru and The Answer have explained the delay in finalizing the licence and distribution mechanism. Vlada keeps pointing out that there has been no change in the plan to roll this out.

    The players on servers that are frustrated with the perodic resets coming in here and asking when this will happen does nothing to accelerate the process. Server operators that hear frustration about it from the players on their server coming here and trying to rush it along are also not helping.

    Asking if it is moving forward periodically is OK, but if someone has asked and answered in the previous two weeks is probably frequent enough and if someone has asked given them a day or two to reply.

    This project has done a lot, especially in the last year, so I am comfortable that it will happen. Like the others I would prefer it to be sooner or later, but part of what people like about SWG, especially the pre-CU, is that it takes patience to achieve things in the game. That willingness to be patient needs to carry over to the forums and toward the project.
    Quote Originally Posted by Vlada View Post
    Jedi dont ruin SWG, people ruin SWG.
    My Blog about SWG and possible changes

  10. #10
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    16
    Play Stats
    Inactive
    Quote Originally Posted by Tiars View Post

    The players on servers that are frustrated with the perodic resets coming in here and asking when this will happen does nothing to accelerate the process. Server operators that hear frustration about it from the players on their server coming here and trying to rush it along are also not helping.

    Asking if it is moving forward periodically is OK, but if someone has asked and answered in the previous two weeks is probably frequent enough and if someone has asked given them a day or two to reply.
    If not for us coming on this forum to check if there has been any progression...we wouldnt have gotten those "answers" two weeks ago. So it is helping.
    It helps so that the people here see and others see that there is still an interest for the reset change / open source. In my opinion it has progressed beyond theory and was to be implemented.
    One could easily argue that swgemu could lose their control over this, or the approved servers may actually help swgemu and/or possibly garner more interest to the project as a whole.

    For those that have had their applications for this approved, out of good faith, a reset timer change should be made.
    Lots of new star wars things around coming out very soon, many may not even bother with this anymore, and that effects the project as a whole.

    Its laughably shortsighted to maintain the reset timer on approved private servers.

    Finally, three words sayings "it is licensing" or " soon" are not answers.
    Setting a Date a month from now on a definitive answer or release says a lot about how serious SWGemu actually is, if the real answer is December (why tease for it 8 months?) or we are afraid that once we open source it we lose our control...you should check you sig quote and question whether people like me are those "people" or its others that will ultimately be responsible for ruining swg...

  11. #11
    Junior Member lei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    59
    Play Stats
    Inactive
    Quote Originally Posted by kryst1979 View Post
    ...

    Finally, three words sayings "it is licensing" or " soon" are not answers.
    Setting a Date a month from now on a definitive answer or release says a lot about how serious SWGemu actually is, if the real answer is December (why tease for it 8 months?) or we are afraid that once we open source it we lose our control...you should check you sig quote and question whether people like me are those "people" or its others that will ultimately be responsible for ruining swg...
    Why do I hate to read such things? This is where the cat gets her tail and the daily marmot greets. From core1 to core3. Some things do change, others dont.

  12. #12
    Addicted
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,901
    Play Stats
    Inactive
    Probably because in the very early days of SWGEmu, they gave rough ETA's, and people got pissed when SWGEmu couldn't meet people's expectations, because it's kind of a volunteer project.

  13. #13
    Junior Member lei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    59
    Play Stats
    Inactive
    Well, some people are always pissed by whatever, but I dont remember core1/2 issues with pissed people. With core1 it was more something like a team issue, core2 then was quite ready and had a playable server, but due to its issued, twisted code it was nuked to restart everything with core3 which has a much straighter coding policy. Just as far as a few words may describe it.

    Personally I'm not glad with the volunteer argument because its a kind of discussion killer. And even though its true, is it really a reason for sloppy communication?

    As TA has written in April the engine restrictions already have been lifted. Or are they back in place? I dont want to set up a trunk copy of everything just to verify that.

  14. #14
    Addicted Tiars's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Ironforge, Uther
    Posts
    3,833
    Play Stats
    Inactive
    Quote Originally Posted by lei View Post
    As TA has written in April the engine restrictions already have been lifted. Or are they back in place? I dont want to set up a trunk copy of everything just to verify that.
    As later commented on by Oru, the engine without the built in 2.5 hour reboot has not yet been distributed. The issue seems to be making sure the licensing is something that they are comfortable with, verification of conformance to the new agreement and distributing only to those that have accepted the license. Also to be clear, core3 does not have the 2.5 hour reboot as can be seen with Nova and Basilisk, but what has been distributed for developers had the 2.5 hour reboot added. The statement that the 2.5 hour reboot has been lifted is a reference to Nova and Basilisk and not what is available to developers.
    Quote Originally Posted by Vlada View Post
    Jedi dont ruin SWG, people ruin SWG.
    My Blog about SWG and possible changes

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    410
    Play Stats
    Inactive
    It's like I tell my kid, "You get what you get, and you don't throw a fit..." it will be ready when it's ready and until then whining about it won't change the situation.

    FWIW, if people are so upset that this project doesn't move at their expected pace, nearly all of the information necessary to create your own emulator is available, freely, from the SWGEMU sources and other older development project sites. Most of the packets have been identified, most of the math and rules have been implemented and tested... the groundwork is there, and communicating with the client shouldn't be an issue anymore.

    If you don't like the pace of this public & volunteer project, then start your own project. I really don't see what the big deal is anymore...

    -Duff

Closed Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts