Closed Thread
Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 181

Thread: SWGEmu AGPL Instructions and Requirements

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    The Vlada Vlada's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    The Vlada
    Posts
    33,034
    Play Stats
    Inactive
    Quote Originally Posted by Aso View Post
    Thanks for the update. I thought with this thread being posted and what Vlada posted, we were just waiting for you to get back into town. Did not realize things were still not complete. Ill be awaiting the email.
    Well, considering that TA wasn't here, I could only guess what was going to happen. It appears i guessed wrong. Sorry about that. To make it up to you I am willing to send you a picture of a very cute baby animal of your choosing.

  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    122
    Play Stats
    Inactive
    TA, does this mean we shouldn't have submitted applications yet?
    Personal site @ WritingUnderDuress.com
    Pretend dev @ An Empire in Flames

  3. #3
    Retired Lead Developer
    Join Date
    Dec 1970
    Posts
    767
    Play Stats
    Inactive
    Quote Originally Posted by Halyn View Post
    TA, does this mean we shouldn't have submitted applications yet?
    No, submitting them is fine, but thats why we havent started distributing the engine yet.

    theanswer@swgemu.com | www.swgemu.com
    SWGEmu is a non-profit, open source community project.
    SWGEmu FAQ | Install SWGEmu | Report Bugs

  4. #4
    Junior Member Thrax989's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    CA,San Francisco
    Posts
    220
    Play Stats
    Inactive
    You should put the new No time restriction engine into unstable. It would be no difference from the 2:25 hour engine already in there that is locked. Even if you changed it to 24 hours pushed it to public so we could pull latest wouldn't the engine still be locked like the one i use from unstable at the moment.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    410
    Play Stats
    Inactive
    Probably not. Only in rare instances will you see a commercial software package open up it's source (for the older versions) after it's upgraded to a newer version. Actually, I don't recall ever seeing that happen in reality...

    I've seen older versions have their license restrictions removed, and basically become a free to use product, but I've never seen anyone open up their copyrighted source...

    -Duff

  6. #6
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    7
    Play Stats
    Inactive
    Quote Originally Posted by duffstone View Post
    Probably not. Only in rare instances will you see a commercial software package open up it's source (for the older versions) after it's upgraded to a newer version. Actually, I don't recall ever seeing that happen in reality...

    I've seen older versions have their license restrictions removed, and basically become a free to use product, but I've never seen anyone open up their copyrighted source...

    -Duff
    Doom, Wolfenstein3D, Quake{1,2,3} https://github.com/id-Software
    MS-DOS v1/v2 http://www.computerhistory.org/atchm...y-source-code/
    MS Word 1.1a http://www.computerhistory.org/atchm...a-source-code/
    just to pick a few famous examples ;-)

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    410
    Play Stats
    Inactive
    so yeah, in 20 years you might get engine3. :-p

  8. #8
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    57
    Play Stats
    Inactive
    Well it really is speculation because we don't know if he is using it commercially or if he was if he still is. Or even if those companies are using it still, can you imagine getting a windows server license 15 years ago and still be using it (I don't know of many companies who still use Windows servers and if they do they have been migrating to Linux for a while). Really the only thing we know 100% is that he owns and probably sells Engine3 licenses however a quick search of engine3 online only returns unreal engine and unity 3.0 revisions.

  9. #9
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    197
    Play Stats
    Inactive
    Nice explanation Oru..

    We have had Scurby drop by our server's vent we play on a few times, as he has been making the rounds.. and he is a big advocate of combining our strengths for a solid common core . etc etc... so in that spirit, if we can re-focus the thread back to it's intent, that would be very constructive....
    Thanks to the DEVs and all the contributors!

  10. #10
    Junior Member Thrax989's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    CA,San Francisco
    Posts
    220
    Play Stats
    Inactive
    "Greetings,

    Thank you for your interest in SWGEmu. Your application has been received and is under review. Your patience and input is greatly appreciated as we walk through this process. "

    Anyone received the engine yet? This the only mail I have received.

  11. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1
    Play Stats
    Inactive
    Quote Originally Posted by thrax989 View Post
    "Greetings,

    Thank you for your interest in SWGEmu. Your application has been received and is under review. Your patience and input is greatly appreciated as we walk through this process. "

    Anyone received the engine yet? This the only mail I have received.
    We received the same. Give 'em some time.

  12. #12
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    25
    Play Stats
    Inactive
    Quote Originally Posted by thrax989 View Post
    "Greetings,

    Thank you for your interest in SWGEmu. Your application has been received and is under review. Your patience and input is greatly appreciated as we walk through this process. "

    Anyone received the engine yet? This the only mail I have received.
    They most likely thought that everyone would be on board with playing on a non hacked engine and would agree with the new license, since they know there is a server that has refused to and they will have to use legal action against them they might have to come up with a way to make sure only people who sign the new license gets their good engine. Or heck they maybe just taking a break after getting the new pub put.

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    331
    Play Stats
    Inactive
    I've always thought limiting downloads on future code to people who hold the approved license would be reasonable. Seems to be the "way of the world".

  14. #14
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    91
    Play Stats
    Inactive
    No news for the first lifting of restriction?

  15. #15
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    80
    Play Stats
    Inactive
    You know those feels when something you are REALLY looking forward to is coming but you have to be all adult and patient and not froth at the mouth about it? That.

Closed Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts