Current and future event guidelines

[Stonecloud]

Did you check to see if they float? Or are you just guessing?

If she weighs more than a duck....

[imhotep71]

But...there are MOJITOS!

Just give me back the bottle of rum. I need another shot

[esmecat]

Yeah I doubt eye-witnesses can claim having seen over 400 Acklays.

perhaps you should read back through that other thread.

Revanis, i had been trying to believe your statement that you were sincere. but you are back to flippant on something that i just supported you on. seriously? seriously?

[Banter]

I must be dumb or I missed something here?

Can someone explain to me what event occurred and what the advantage was? I don't see the what the fuss is about. Can someone please provide me some context surrounding this thread?

And Vlada please don't go!

[Nykwuan]

Respawn Timer: 2 hours
12 a day, so 360 based on a 30 day month.
Next time spawn 360 at the same time.

[Revanis]

Revanis, i had been trying to believe your statement that you were sincere. but you are back to flippant on something that i just supported you on. seriously? seriously?

I am just reminding others of the fact that 360 can spawn in a month, nowhere near that was spawned, just to save people the misunderstanding of "omg they spawned months of acklays???!!11" in the future. That's all.

[novak64]

Respawn Timer: 2 hours
12 a day, so 360 based on a 30 day month.
Next time spawn 360 at the same time.

Assuming 24/7 server uptime.
Though I imagine fewer than this were likely spawned.

[imhotep71]

perhaps you should read back through that other thread.

Revanis, i had been trying to believe your statement that you were sincere. but you are back to flippant on something that i just supported you on. seriously? seriously?

Respawn Timer: 2 hours
12 a day, so 360 based on a 30 day month.
Next time spawn 360 at the same time.

Assuming 24/7 server uptime.
Though I imagine fewer than this were likely spawned.

Exactly what I thought. Esme cmon, MONTHS worth of loot is a gross exaggeration

[Jade_Enigma]

*passes around the 5 year-old rum, and cake. And a fuzzy purry kitteh*

[Nykwuan]

Assuming 24/7 server uptime.
Though I imagine fewer than this were likely spawned.

Excellent point, also depending on how much time is left on spawn timer.
Some of the quick resets could shorten the odd cycle.

[esmecat]

I am just reminding others of the fact that 360 can spawn in a month, nowhere near that was spawned, just to save people the misunderstanding of "omg they spawned months of acklays???!!11" in the future. That's all.

you are not JUST reminding when you make a statement that you *doubt* someone *can claim* to have seen them. especially when they had. you could simply say that it would be over 400 and that doesn't fit with what you know and leave out the sarcasm and flippancy. when you word things the way you do, you are pouring fuel on the fire. you said yourself you haven't checked the logs. you were not there. your information is just as much eye witness testimony as the other side. the logs will know... but either way it is irrelevant at this point. why force an issue that doesn't need to be one. if you push this, people (myself at the very least) will push back to require proof of your statements.

Exactly what I thought. Esme cmon, MONTHS worth of loot is a gross exaggeration

you really want to make issues out of things that have been resolved, don't you.

did you even notice my point that we do not have enough information for either side to make positive claims?

[retto]

i just want ppl to stop acting like they didnt know this would enrage the little people ..

rewarding ppl like C for their years of exploiting / douchebaggery wasnt ever going to end well ..

in the future if youre going to do stuff like this ? why not actually keep it to your selves ? and if you get caught ? well making a bunch of surley posts from staff and c members ? well you might want to knock that off as well ..

may as well unban dragonite and give him all the loot at this point ..

i tend to agree with wilba .. wipe this mofo !!

yeah im lookin at you lolindir !!!!

[imhotep71]

you are not JUST reminding when you make a statement that you *doubt* someone *can claim* to have seen them. especially when they had. you could simply say that it would be over 400 and that doesn't fit with what you know and leave out the sarcasm and flippancy. when you word things the way you do, you are pouring fuel on the fire. you said yourself you haven't checked the logs. you were not there. your information is just as much eye witness testimony as the other side. the logs will know... but either way it is irrelevant at this point. why force an issue that doesn't need to be one. if you push this, people (myself at the very least) will push back to require proof of your statements.

Im not sure but Im thinking the burden of proof here is on the community. If I were Rev or Vlada I wouldnt show you a damn thing. If you've got unaltered screenshots then lets see them.

you really want to make issues out of things that have been resolved, don't you.

did you even notice my point that we do not have enough information for either side to make positive claims?

Then why are you jumping up and down about how many Acklays were spawned???

[Revanis]

you are not JUST reminding when you make a statement that you *doubt* someone *can claim* to have seen them. especially when they had. you could simply say that it would be over 400 and that doesn't fit with what you know and leave out the sarcasm and flippancy. when you word things the way you do, you are pouring fuel on the fire. you said yourself you haven't checked the logs. you were not there. your information is just as much eye witness testimony as the other side. the logs will know... but either way it is irrelevant at this point. why force an issue that doesn't need to be one. if you push this, people (myself at the very least) will push back to require proof of your statements.

Er, okay. If anyone does claim those numbers, then they're either blind or lying.

400+ Acklays would be pretty nuts.

[Jade_Enigma]

you are not JUST reminding when you make a statement that you *doubt* someone *can claim* to have seen them. especially when they had. you could simply say that it would be over 400 and that doesn't fit with what you know and leave out the sarcasm and flippancy. when you word things the way you do, you are pouring fuel on the fire. you said yourself you haven't checked the logs. you were not there. your information is just as much eye witness testimony as the other side. the logs will know... but either way it is irrelevant at this point. why force an issue that doesn't need to be one. if you push this, people (myself at the very least) will push back to require proof of your statements.

Oh gawd could you please just put your pointy stick away for awhile. If you have issue with her method of speaking to you, shake your head and sigh but for the sake of everyone else just take her admission of guilt and let it go.

FUZZY PURRY KITTEH GODDAMNIT!