Bert

About
  • This user has not yet committed.

Reviews

0 active reviews

Counts may include data that you cannot access.
Tuesday 19 Mar
10:21 am

Bert

10:21 am

Bert

10:21 am

Bert

Wednesday 20 Feb
7:53 pm

Bert

  • More
  • SWGEMU-734
  • submitted for moderator approval
4:36 pm

Bert

  • More
  • SWGEMU-733
  • submitted for moderator approval
Monday 18 Feb
11:39 am

Bert

Saturday 16 Feb
1:37 am

Bert

  • More
  • SWGEMU-674
  • submitted for moderator approval
Tuesday 12 Feb
12:42 pm

Bert

  • More
  • SWGEMU-648
  • submitted for moderator approval
Tuesday 05 Feb
3:32 pm

Bert

Removed

Removed

2:18 pm

Bert

It seems to me that it was moved in to the canPerformSkill method at some point and the return was just never changed. Without the false it continues on since canPerformSkill renders true. This is ...

It seems to me that it was moved in to the canPerformSkill method at some point and the return was just never changed. Without the false it continues on since canPerformSkill renders true. This is the same case for the other 4 commands. If you'd like I can move this check in to the doQueueCommand method instead to keep the return value.

1:00 pm

Bert

Heh you're telling me. I asked the same thing when I started this in opendev. That was the existing code for all dots, so I left that as the case for any non poison/disease.

Heh you're telling me. I asked the same thing when I started this in opendev. That was the existing code for all dots, so I left that as the case for any non poison/disease.

Monday 04 Feb
2:28 pm

Bert

All but one was done already in the schematic tool, so I then changed that one to match. All set.

All but one was done already in the schematic tool, so I then changed that one to match. All set.

Sunday 03 Feb
1:11 am

Bert

I found that these changes were done in the schematic tool, so does that mean that they will change next update? They do have the desired effect when I tested them. If they were changed in the sche...

I found that these changes were done in the schematic tool, so does that mean that they will change next update? They do have the desired effect when I tested them. If they were changed in the schematic tool and this isn't needed, then I can abandon the review.

Wednesday 30 Jan
8:26 pm

Bert

I downloaded the tool, but I have not found a way to make the changes to the schematics that I have on here. I'm not sure if the tool has those options or not.

I downloaded the tool, but I have not found a way to make the changes to the schematics that I have on here. I'm not sure if the tool has those options or not.

2:43 pm

Bert

  • More
  • SWGEMU-571
  • submitted for moderator approval
Sunday 27 Jan
5:48 pm

Bert

  • More
  • SWGEMU-566
  • submitted for moderator approval
Saturday 26 Jan
1:40 pm

Bert

Changed and uploaded new version.

Changed and uploaded new version.

Friday 25 Jan
1:10 pm

Bert

  • More
  • SWGEMU-554
  • submitted for moderator approval
Thursday 24 Jan
7:23 pm

Bert

  • More
  • SWGEMU-552
  • submitted for moderator approval
Monday 21 Jan
9:08 pm

Bert

Research documentation: -Resist pack values = http://web.archive.org/web/20050205185410/http://forums.station.sony.com/swg/board/message?board.id=doctor&message.id=80380 -Resist buffs not using wo...

Research documentation:

-Resist pack values = http://web.archive.org/web/20050205185410/http://forums.station.sony.com/swg/board/message?board.id=doctor&message.id=80380
-Resist buffs not using wound treatment = http://web.archive.org/web/20050218124800/http://forums.station.sony.com/swg/board/message?board.id=combat_medic&message.id=39676
-Creating chance to apply dots equation = http://web.archive.org/web/20040914223306/http://forums.station.sony.com/swg/board/message?board.id=combat_medic&message.id=40604&view=by_date_ascending&page=1

The wayback machine ate that last post which had actual potency vs resist testing done (hope it works when you go to review). I based my math off of it which showed that when the potency and resist were near equal, it was around a 50/50 chance. Then when there was around a potency over 100 more than resist the chance was 90+% and when resist was 100 or more over potency, it resisted 90+%. Hopefully that page becomes viewable again so it doesn't look like I made up the numbers randomly.

As far as the resist packs themselves, the page shows components only contributing 50% of their values to final combine, and that the final combine numbers were 1/2 of what we have now.

9:06 pm

Bert

  • More
  • SWGEMU-542
  • submitted for moderator approval
Tuesday 01 Jan
11:18 pm

Bert

Thanks for all the insight, it was helpful. I missed how the lightsabers were done, and had only looked at the lightning rifle...so it's changed to derivedFrom now. I also removed the flame dot on ...

Thanks for all the insight, it was helpful. I missed how the lightsabers were done, and had only looked at the lightning rifle...so it's changed to derivedFrom now. I also removed the flame dot on the flamethrower specials, as you suggested, and will work on that for another review.

Friday 28 Dec 2012
2:50 pm

Bert

Just a start to commando specials. The range, weapon check, animations, combat spam, and multipliers are set. The problem that I'm working on (might be beyond my capabilities) is the fire dot. It's...

Just a start to commando specials. The range, weapon check, animations, combat spam, and multipliers are set. The problem that I'm working on (might be beyond my capabilities) is the fire dot. It's currently set to do full combat spam dmg when it's supposed to be 10% combat spam and a 2% wounding dot. I"ve modified it to work properly on my server, but it affects all fire dots and I'm not sure how torso shot is supposed to really work. Values taken from http://www.swgemu.com/archive/scrapbookv51/data/20070210154659/index.html. If anybody wants to help out or take what I've done and run with it, feel free.

1:51 pm

Bert

updated to latest revision and modified the beserk kahmurra lair because the creature mob changed a couple days ago

updated to latest revision and modified the beserk kahmurra lair because the creature mob changed a couple days ago

Friday 21 Dec 2012
11:50 am

Bert

Sorry loshult about the mess of swegemu-474 it must have missed the last edit I did. So here it is to fix that issue from that commit.

Sorry loshult about the mess of swegemu-474 it must have missed the last edit I did. So here it is to fix that issue from that commit.

11:48 am

Bert

  • More
  • SWGEMU-490
  • submitted for moderator approval
Monday 17 Dec 2012
2:16 pm

Bert

I removed the anchors to all the other patches and uploaded a cleaner one (patchfinal). Let me know if that one gives a conflict still.

I removed the anchors to all the other patches and uploaded a cleaner one (patchfinal). Let me know if that one gives a conflict still.

1:02 pm

Bert

One of the fixes was apparently under another review and got committed. I removed it and uploaded a new patch with the corrections.

One of the fixes was apparently under another review and got committed. I removed it and uploaded a new patch with the corrections.

Monday 10 Dec 2012
1:15 am

Bert

Copied creature resource amounts from wrix as they are the same size and type.

Copied creature resource amounts from wrix as they are the same size and type.

1:13 am

Bert

  • More
  • SWGEMU-475
  • submitted for moderator approval