station.com Sign In / Change User Join Free Why Join? See the world of SONY
   
Search the Knowledge Base Games Community Store My Account Help
Star Wars Galaxies
Core Systems
Sign In  ·  Help
Jump to Page:   1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5  |  Next Page
 
Re: Vision to discourage "leet-speak" and improve language and atmosphere in SWG (updated 03/11/2005
Options    Options  
PaleGT1
SWG Second Lieutenant
Posts: 182
Registered: 10-26-2003



Reply 31 of 68

Viewed 270 times




Puertoriqueno wrote:
I agree with the first part, disagree strongly with the second part. A very small percentage of players role play in this game...the second suggestion would force them to change their communication style to conform to a role-play vision. This would be the wrong thing to do.
 
Role players should not have their game spoiled by leeters, but nor should role-players dictate any game or it's mechanics. The first item suggested is the best option IMHO.



 

 

    Kinda funny how you bash roleplayers and accuse them of wanting to change the game mechanics (which his suggestion will not do), but yet you sound like you endorse the fact that the leet-mongers have all along been running roughshod over the devs and forcing them to turn the game into something it's not. Sounds like you say it's fine that the combat system is so screwed up because of the exploiters. More power to you then, just don't blame me when that 500k hammed womp rat sends you to the clone clinic.

    Simply Gwen

 

 

03-15-2005 12:38 PM  

Report Abuse to a Moderator
 
Re: Vision to discourage "leet-speak" and improve language and atmosphere in SWG (updated 03/11/2005   [ Edited ]
Options    Options  
damsel
Jedi
Posts: 1077
Registered: 05-03-2004


damsel
PA: Brute Squad
Server: Bloodfin

Reply 32 of 68

Viewed 258 times


What kills me about the whole thing is that the game is called a MMORPG = massive(ly) multiplayer online role-playing game. Yet, the majority are not roleplayers. *sigh*

Message Edited by damsel on 03-15-2005 04:49 PM

00000000000000000000
00000000000000000000
00000000000000000000
00000000000000000000
00000000000000000000
00000000000000000000
00000000000000000000
0000000000000000000
0 Eridwi'~AKA "Dwiliscious"
00000000000000000000 Queen of the Sith

00000000000000000000 Mayor of Pirate's Cove, Lok
03-15-2005 01:48 PM  

Report Abuse to a Moderator
 
Re: Vision to discourage "leet-speak" and improve language and atmosphere in SWG (updated 03/11/2005
Options    Options  
Scruffdawg
SWG Chief Petty Officer
Posts: 51
Registered: 10-24-2003


Scruffdawg
PA: Aeon
Server: Sunrunner

Reply 33 of 68

Viewed 256 times


Part of me wants to say #1 is a good idea.  If a player wants to filter the spatial chat around them then that should be their choice right?  I can understand it lessening the experience when people use various forms of slang and leet etc.  But what about when people go on about the basketball game last night or the latest terrorist threat?  No filter can properly turn regular, natural conversation into Star Wars specific lingo.
 
I think the best bet is to enjoy role-playing with the people you role-play with and to tolerate people around you who refuse.. frustrating as it can be sometimes.
 
As for #2, I'm all for enforcement of rules that would be enforced in the Star Wars world, like spitting on Imperials (worth every credit ) but to penalize leet-speak also acknowledges its existence in an official way.  That I don't like.  I think it really should just be ignored.
 
Just my 2 creds... and I don't mean to be critical.  Nice to see people thinking of ways to improve the experience. 

Jahn
03-15-2005 02:14 PM  

Report Abuse to a Moderator
 
Re: Vision to discourage "leet-speak" and improve language and atmosphere in SWG (updated 03/11/2005   [ Edited ]
Options    Options  
Glzmo
Galactic Senator
Posts: 4378
Registered: 07-04-2003


Glzmo

Reply 34 of 68

Viewed 255 times




Scruffdawg wrote:
Part of me wants to say #1 is a good idea.  If a player wants to filter the spatial chat around them then that should be their choice right?  I can understand it lessening the experience when people use various forms of slang and leet etc.  But what about when people go on about the basketball game last night or the latest terrorist threat?  No filter can properly turn regular, natural conversation into Star Wars specific lingo.
 
You could replace basketball with smashball (a sport in the Expanded Universe), Talking about terrorists may be interpreted as talking about rebels as well, so it's no biggie.
Of course, there is no way to filter out everything, but at least we could filter out much of the annoying stuff. Plus, you could change swearwords to curses common in Star Wars like 'Sithspawn' as well
 
I think the best bet is to enjoy role-playing with the people you role-play with and to tolerate people around you who refuse.. frustrating as it can be sometimes.
 
I try. I have tried since launch. But lately it has been getting more and more annoying. Most of my RP friends have deserted me in favor of WOW (it has special RP servers and it is said there are far less "leet-speakers" there). Also, it seems that more and more non-roleplayers and "leet-speakers" are entering the frey. I know that many of my RP friends would have stayed if there was such a word filter, in fact we have pitched the idea around several times in the past. If it would bring them back, I do not know, probably the most Star Wars loyal of them.
There really is no reason to not implement a word filter, as it does nobody any harm and improves the experience for the ones that choose to use it.
 
As for #2, I'm all for enforcement of rules that would be enforced in the Star Wars world, like spitting on Imperials (worth every credit ) but to penalize leet-speak also acknowledges its existence in an official way.  That I don't like.  I think it really should just be ignored.
 
It could be seen as the NPCs not understanding what the players say and talking gibberish, thus concluding they are annoying and crazy and knock them out.
But I am seriously considering to remove the second point in the main post anyway. It just seems a little too much to want to improve people's language
 
Just my 2 creds... and I don't mean to be critical.  Nice to see people thinking of ways to improve the experience. 
 
Thank you for your input 

Message Edited by Glzmo on 03-15-2005 06:12 PM

=======xgggggggggggggggggggggggg)
"I am the Senate."
GLZMO - visionaire extraordinaire, self-proclaimed guardian and enforcer of roleplay and Star Wars continuity in Star Wars Galaxies
Click here to read and support these Visions to improve and possibly save SWG!
"If you think somebody with the Smuggler Profession in SWG is a smuggler you likely think an ox is a full bull."
03-15-2005 02:44 PM  

Report Abuse to a Moderator
 
Re: Vision to discourage "leet-speak" and improve language and atmosphere in SWG (updated 03/11/2005
Options    Options  
Scruffdawg
SWG Chief Petty Officer
Posts: 51
Registered: 10-24-2003


Scruffdawg
PA: Aeon
Server: Sunrunner

Reply 35 of 68

Viewed 250 times


Ooooo dedicated RP servers?  That seems like a good idea. 
 
Bottom line is, yeah, turning on a filter is the players choice and if it did make the experience better then I'm all for it.

Jahn
03-15-2005 02:56 PM  

Report Abuse to a Moderator
 
Re: Vision to discourage "leet-speak" and improve language and atmosphere in SWG (updated 03/16/2005   [ Edited ]
Options    Options  
Glzmo
Galactic Senator
Posts: 4378
Registered: 07-04-2003


Glzmo

Reply 36 of 68

Viewed 246 times


Main post update:


Glzmo removed the following from the main post:
+ It may even make the ideas in section 2. obsolete
 
2. Optionally, using so-called “leet-speak” in spatial chat next to any NPCs like police, stormtroopers and rebels and will cause them to incapacitate and fine you just like a stromtrooper currently does when you insult him. A system message only you yourself can see will then appear on your screen and tell you "You have used the word , it is outlawed in this galaxy".
Perhaps even a faction scan could check your spatial chat logs for “leet-speak” and attack and fine you for it. No factional rank or other means to avoid a scan should allow “leet-speakers” to be spared.
+ This will discourage players from using "leet-speak" in cities and other populated areas
+ It will encourage proper language in Star Wars Galaxies
+ It will teach players to use more mature language

+ Simple to implement, code from Stormtroopers can be reused

Message Edited by Glzmo on 03-14-2005 09:08 AM


Message Edited by Glzmo on 03-16-2005 02:18 AM

=======xgggggggggggggggggggggggg)
"I am the Senate."
GLZMO - visionaire extraordinaire, self-proclaimed guardian and enforcer of roleplay and Star Wars continuity in Star Wars Galaxies
Click here to read and support these Visions to improve and possibly save SWG!
"If you think somebody with the Smuggler Profession in SWG is a smuggler you likely think an ox is a full bull."
03-15-2005 06:13 PM  

Report Abuse to a Moderator
 
Re: Vision to discourage "leet-speak" and improve language and atmosphere in SWG (updated 03/11/2005
Options    Options  
Puertoriqueno
Jedi
Posts: 2309
Registered: 09-25-2003


Puertoriqueno
PA: Nightsoft - Rough Riders
Server: Bria

Reply 37 of 68

Viewed 239 times




PaleGT1 wrote:


Puertoriqueno wrote:
I agree with the first part, disagree strongly with the second part. A very small percentage of players role play in this game...the second suggestion would force them to change their communication style to conform to a role-play vision. This would be the wrong thing to do.
 
Role players should not have their game spoiled by leeters, but nor should role-players dictate any game or it's mechanics. The first item suggested is the best option IMHO.



 

 

    Kinda funny how you bash roleplayers and accuse them of wanting to change the game mechanics (which his suggestion will not do), but yet you sound like you endorse the fact that the leet-mongers have all along been running roughshod over the devs and forcing them to turn the game into something it's not. Sounds like you say it's fine that the combat system is so screwed up because of the exploiters. More power to you then, just don't blame me when that 500k hammed womp rat sends you to the clone clinic.

    Simply Gwen

 

 




?

How is my post bashing role players? Sounds to me like it supported the role player's desire to avoid leet speak. I just dont think that a minority should dictate gameplay to the majority, so the first option is good, second is bad? Why do role players have to force the issue? Isnt a chat block enough?


~<<<EGIDA>>>~
/// Master Architect/Master Artisan/Master Merchant \\\
\\\------------Master Politician/Novice Fencer------------///



03-15-2005 10:27 PM  

Report Abuse to a Moderator
 
Re: Vision to discourage "leet-speak" and improve language and atmosphere in SWG (updated 03/11/2005
Options    Options  
Puertoriqueno
Jedi
Posts: 2309
Registered: 09-25-2003


Puertoriqueno
PA: Nightsoft - Rough Riders
Server: Bria

Reply 38 of 68

Viewed 239 times




damsel wrote:
What kills me about the whole thing is that the game is called a MMORPG = massive(ly) multiplayer online role-playing game. Yet, the majority are not roleplayers. *sigh*

Message Edited by damsel on 03-15-2005 04:49 PM



I know, and your right, it is silly. Unfortunately it is the nature of things.


~<<<EGIDA>>>~
/// Master Architect/Master Artisan/Master Merchant \\\
\\\------------Master Politician/Novice Fencer------------///



03-15-2005 10:28 PM  

Report Abuse to a Moderator
 
Re: Vision to discourage "leet-speak" and improve language and atmosphere in SWG (updated 03/11/2005
Options    Options  
Puertoriqueno
Jedi
Posts: 2309
Registered: 09-25-2003


Puertoriqueno
PA: Nightsoft - Rough Riders
Server: Bria

Reply 39 of 68

Viewed 238 times




Glzmo wrote:


Scruffdawg wrote:
Part of me wants to say #1 is a good idea.  If a player wants to filter the spatial chat around them then that should be their choice right?  I can understand it lessening the experience when people use various forms of slang and leet etc.  But what about when people go on about the basketball game last night or the latest terrorist threat?  No filter can properly turn regular, natural conversation into Star Wars specific lingo.
 
You could replace basketball with smashball (a sport in the Expanded Universe), Talking about terrorists may be interpreted as talking about rebels as well, so it's no biggie.
Of course, there is no way to filter out everything, but at least we could filter out much of the annoying stuff. Plus, you could change swearwords to curses common in Star Wars like 'Sithspawn' as well
 
I think the best bet is to enjoy role-playing with the people you role-play with and to tolerate people around you who refuse.. frustrating as it can be sometimes.
 
I try. I have tried since launch. But lately it has been getting more and more annoying. Most of my RP friends have deserted me in favor of WOW (it has special RP servers and it is said there are far less "leet-speakers" there). Also, it seems that more and more non-roleplayers and "leet-speakers" are entering the frey. I know that many of my RP friends would have stayed if there was such a word filter, in fact we have pitched the idea around several times in the past. If it would bring them back, I do not know, probably the most Star Wars loyal of them.
There really is no reason to not implement a word filter, as it does nobody any harm and improves the experience for the ones that choose to use it.
 
As for #2, I'm all for enforcement of rules that would be enforced in the Star Wars world, like spitting on Imperials (worth every credit ) but to penalize leet-speak also acknowledges its existence in an official way.  That I don't like.  I think it really should just be ignored.
 
It could be seen as the NPCs not understanding what the players say and talking gibberish, thus concluding they are annoying and crazy and knock them out.
But I am seriously considering to remove the second point in the main post anyway. It just seems a little too much to want to improve people's language
 
Just my 2 creds... and I don't mean to be critical.  Nice to see people thinking of ways to improve the experience. 
 
Thank you for your input 

Message Edited by Glzmo on 03-15-2005 06:12 PM



Well, bravo to you Gizmo. 5 Stars. If you are willing to tone down the second part of your suggestion, I would be all for this. Role-players need to be recognized and deserve the right to play the game as it was intended. A block would do just that.


~<<<EGIDA>>>~
/// Master Architect/Master Artisan/Master Merchant \\\
\\\------------Master Politician/Novice Fencer------------///



03-15-2005 10:30 PM  

Report Abuse to a Moderator
 
Re: Vision to discourage "leet-speak" and improve language and atmosphere in SWG (updated 03/16/2005
Options    Options  
Giamai
Jedi
Posts: 15154
Registered: 09-10-2003


Giamai
PA: -V-/VOA
Server: Ahazi

Reply 40 of 68

Viewed 234 times


I can see where leet-speak might bother some people but to be honest i'm not sure that what you are even looking at here is all leet-speak per se. 
 
for example, most often when people are using pwned or uber thats the leet speak thing in action.
 
but u for you and thx for thanks is really more of a form of laziness, using an abbreviation rather than typing everything out.  the same could even be said for lol or rofl.  having any sort of negative reaction from npc's based on things like this could include pretty much any abbreviation, even new ones that may be added as the online language continues to evolve.  so removing that idea is a fabulous thing
 
basically, what you are almost calling for is a client-side filter to correct grammatical and spelling errors rather than removing what does or does not fit with a roleplaying concept. 
 
since this is a client side filter, you could probably get someone to write this for you as a 3rd party add-on for any game, not just swg

TGiamai Oewai (Elder Jedi without a clue)T
T Giaman Srawhe, 12 pt MWS [GS] Weapons, near Theed -3955, 3322T
TGiavamai Oewai, Where's the lewt?T
T Ahazi T
T*Not everyone who wanders is lost...*T
03-16-2005 12:48 AM  

Report Abuse to a Moderator
 
Re: Vision to discourage "leet-speak" and improve language and atmosphere in SWG (updated 03/16/2005
Options    Options  
Jagged-F3l
Jedi
Posts: 2347
Registered: 04-20-2004


Jagged-F3l
PA: Remnants of Honor
Server: Chilastra

Reply 41 of 68

Viewed 220 times


I do not use l33t-speak. However, I must most strongly protest your vision, based on the simple notion that it infringes on our most basic inalienable rights as human beings. Here in the United States of America, the First Amendment of our Constitution protects us from censorship and people with notions of hindering our ability to express ourselves.
 
As it applies to Star Wars, I think we can all associate ourselves with the Rebel Alliance, as they stood for a set of ideals not unlike those we Americans have fought hard for the last two and a half centuries.
 
I am personally offended that anyone would suggest the vision you have suggested here, and suggest you keep these types of views to yourself.

010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101Jagged' Fel
0101010101
0101010101010101010101010101010101
0101010101010101"The Oppressor"
010101010101
010101010101010101010101010101010101
010101010101
010101
010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
010101
01010101
01010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
01010101
010101
010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
010101
0101
0101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
0101
0101
0101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
0101
01
01010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
01
01
01010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
01
01
01010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
01
0101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
01
0101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
01
0101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
01
03-16-2005 10:02 AM  

Report Abuse to a Moderator
 
Re: Vision to discourage "leet-speak" and improve language and atmosphere in SWG (updated 03/11/2005
Options    Options  
Jagged-F3l
Jedi
Posts: 2347
Registered: 04-20-2004


Jagged-F3l
PA: Remnants of Honor
Server: Chilastra

Reply 42 of 68

Viewed 209 times




damsel wrote:
What kills me about the whole thing is that the game is called a MMORPG = massive(ly) multiplayer online role-playing game. Yet, the majority are not roleplayers. *sigh*

Message Edited by damsel on 03-15-2005 04:49 PM



Actually, SWG has been classified formally by the game industry as an MMOG, not an MMORPG. The notion of role-playing in SWG is optional. Case in point, the fact that there is a "Role Player" flag that one can set in their personal profile.

010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101Jagged' Fel
0101010101
0101010101010101010101010101010101
0101010101010101"The Oppressor"
010101010101
010101010101010101010101010101010101
010101010101
010101
010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
010101
01010101
01010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
01010101
010101
010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
010101
0101
0101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
0101
0101
0101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
0101
01
01010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
01
01
01010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
01
01
01010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
01
0101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
01
0101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
01
0101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
01
03-16-2005 10:08 AM  

Report Abuse to a Moderator
 
Re: Vision to discourage "leet-speak" and improve language and atmosphere in SWG (updated 03/16/2005
Options    Options  
Giamai
Jedi
Posts: 15154
Registered: 09-10-2003


Giamai
PA: -V-/VOA
Server: Ahazi

Reply 43 of 68

Viewed 199 times


actually, it isn't censorship the way he has it written...its a client side filter which means there is no imposing rules on what you type, only what the person using it reads.
 
it is the same as me not having a subscription to the playboy channel on my cable...i don't need it and i don't want it.  but me not having it is not censoring its existence, its me not being exposed to it.  or perhaps a better analogy is if it turns the playbody channel into the bravo channel. 
 
censorship is what his initial idea was, to include the responses of npc's to be decidedly negative in response to players using any leet-speak or abbreviations in their presence.  this is unfairly impinging on others gameplay and removing that idea is a good thing. 
 
many nonnative english speakers are prone to abbreviated phrases and incorrect grammar such as using u and thx which is why i call it a grammar filter....1 star me if you want but brb, bbiab, lol, rofl, afaik, and other such things are not leet-speak.  they are simply time saving chat devices people use routinely and have since the first chat rooms started many years ago.  more will likely be added over time  

TGiamai Oewai (Elder Jedi without a clue)T
T Giaman Srawhe, 12 pt MWS [GS] Weapons, near Theed -3955, 3322T
TGiavamai Oewai, Where's the lewt?T
T Ahazi T
T*Not everyone who wanders is lost...*T
03-16-2005 10:18 AM  

Report Abuse to a Moderator
 
Re: Vision to discourage "leet-speak" and improve language and atmosphere in SWG (updated 03/16/2005
Options    Options  
Jagged-F3l
Jedi
Posts: 2347
Registered: 04-20-2004


Jagged-F3l
PA: Remnants of Honor
Server: Chilastra

Reply 44 of 68

Viewed 195 times




Giamai wrote:
actually, it isn't censorship the way he has it written...its a client side filter which means there is no imposing rules on what you type, only what the person using it reads.
 
it is the same as me not having a subscription to the playboy channel on my cable...i don't need it and i don't want it.  but me not having it is not censoring its existence, its me not being exposed to it.  or perhaps a better analogy is if it turns the playbody channel into the bravo channel. 
 
censorship is what his initial idea was, to include the responses of npc's to be decidedly negative in response to players using any leet-speak or abbreviations in their presence.  this is unfairly impinging on others gameplay and removing that idea is a good thing. 
 
many nonnative english speakers are prone to abbreviated phrases and incorrect grammar such as using u and thx which is why i call it a grammar filter....1 star me if you want but brb, bbiab, lol, rofl, afaik, and other such things are not leet-speak.  they are simply time saving chat devices people use routinely and have since the first chat rooms started many years ago.  more will likely be added over time  



I disagree with your analogy. Your analogy applies better to the ability to filter obscene language. l33t-speak is not an obscene language, but a legitimate means of expressing oneself. Just because the use of this "language" is currently prevelant with a single generation doesn't make it any less legitimate. l33t-speak represents an evolution of written language that has come about from an Internet culture. This can be likened to the evolution of spoken language over time, primarily driven by each new generation that graces our society. Do you want to stop this evolution as well?

And where does this type of censorship (and it is censorship) stop? Do you want a filter for bad spelling, poor grammar, abbreviations and acronyms?

My advice is simple. Lighten up and learn to adapt. The world is a broad base of many flavors of everything you can think of. Putting one flavor or another down is nothing less than prejudice and there is no room for these notions in any community, including online and gaming communities.

010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101Jagged' Fel
0101010101
0101010101010101010101010101010101
0101010101010101"The Oppressor"
010101010101
010101010101010101010101010101010101
010101010101
010101
010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
010101
01010101
01010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
01010101
010101
010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
010101
0101
0101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
0101
0101
0101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
0101
01
01010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
01
01
01010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
01
01
01010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
01
0101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
01
0101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
01
0101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
01
03-16-2005 10:47 AM  

Report Abuse to a Moderator
 
Re: Vision to discourage "leet-speak" and improve language and atmosphere in SWG (updated 03/16/2005
Options    Options  
Jagged-F3l
Jedi
Posts: 2347
Registered: 04-20-2004


Jagged-F3l
PA: Remnants of Honor
Server: Chilastra

Reply 45 of 68

Viewed 195 times




Jagged-F3l wrote:
I do not use l33t-speak. However, I must most strongly protest your vision, based on the simple notion that it infringes on our most basic inalienable rights as human beings. Here in the United States of America, the First Amendment of our Constitution protects us from censorship and people with notions of hindering our ability to express ourselves.
 
As it applies to Star Wars, I think we can all associate ourselves with the Rebel Alliance, as they stood for a set of ideals not unlike those we Americans have fought hard for the last two and a half centuries.
 
I am personally offended that anyone would suggest the vision you have suggested here, and suggest you keep these types of views to yourself.



One star! If that's the way you feel, move to China or Syria, I'm sure they'd love your ideas.

010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101Jagged' Fel
0101010101
0101010101010101010101010101010101
0101010101010101"The Oppressor"
010101010101
010101010101010101010101010101010101
010101010101
010101
010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
010101
01010101
01010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
01010101
010101
010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
010101
0101
0101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
0101
0101
0101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
0101
01
01010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
01
01
01010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
01
01
01010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
01
0101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
01
0101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
01
0101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
01
03-16-2005 10:49 AM  

Report Abuse to a Moderator
Jump to Page:   1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5  |  Next Page