station.com Sign In / Change User Join Free Why Join? See the world of SONY
   
Search the Knowledge Base Games Community Store My Account Help
Star Wars Galaxies
Game Play Discussion
Sign In  ·  Help
Jump to Page:   « · 27 · 28 · 29 · 30 · 31 · 32 · 33 · 34 · 35 · »  |  Next Page
 
Re: A bit of news around the SOE rumors and SWG
Options    Options  
Smed
Dev
Posts: 131
Registered: 05-03-2005



Reply 451 of 3133

Viewed 5272 times




Altyrell wrote:

What is thy Bidding my MASTER (From the MIGHT OF THE ~MEOW~ to EMPEROR Smed)

  1. Could you say if the "Secret Project" that several (rough est. 95%) DEVs are working on, has anything to do with SWG?
  2. Will Smuggler's be able to Smuggle (i mean ACTUAL Smuggle)
  3. Are you going to get an "actual" SIG???
  4. CAPITOL SHIPS... What be ye Thoughts Admiral Smed
  5. What are your thoughts on this Idea: {PLUG: My idea for LS Crafting}??
  6. Any chance you could put in a "good" word for me, in the Galatic Senate Program?

 

Message Edited by Altyrell on 03-24-200609:57 AM






Secret Poject? Where do people come up with this stuff. ALL developers on SWG are focused on the publish plan you saw. We were in the preliminary planning/design stages of a design for an expansion pack a few months back. When we saw how much work the live game needed and the reaction from both the community and the focus groups we dropped those plans. We can worry about that later.

Smed
03-24-2006 11:24 AM  

Report Abuse to a Moderator
 
Re: A bit of news arround the SOE rumors and SWG
Options    Options  
UubuAlt
SWG Chief Petty Officer
Posts: 217
Registered: 12-02-2004


UubuAlt

Reply 452 of 3133

Viewed 5217 times



 


Smed wrote:


KrackenOne wrote:


Smed wrote:


RKO wrote:


Smed wrote:


jon_arner wrote:
i think you can answer this Smed:
 
will we ever see a lock on target system agen? Will we ever get a skill sytem simmular, or like the one we had before? And do you think this gaem feel like Star Wars?





1) No target lock is planned or being discussed.
2) There will be additional skills for each profession, but not like the system before. I realize this is contriversial but there it is.


Smed

man this game is never going to get better.

why can't you do these things?

Message Edited by RKO on 03-24-200609:26 AM






Why can't we do these things?

1) Target lock - Believe it or not we talked long and hard about this one. If you seriously sit down and think about the nature of the NGE style of combat, it means that people need to be able to use actual skill to hit. If you take that away you need to go back to the more turn based system we had before. It just plain wouldn't work. Now you can make a legitimate argument that we shouldn't use this style of combat. I have no defense against that argument because nearly every other MMO out there uses that style of combat and clearly it works. What we are trying to do here is create a new style of gameplay. Does it work? Well.. for some people it does, and for others it doesn't. That's the truth. For myself, I prefer it to the old combat system which I personally found dull. But that's just my personal opinion. The reality is we've changed to the new system and we're moving forward. It isn't that we can't add target locking.. it's that wer'e not going to because there isn't a way to do it that wouldn't reduce the skill level needed.

2) The more rigid profession system we've switched to just doesn't lend itself to a skill system that's like what we had before.

Smed

OK.... i understand the reasoning behind Target Lock and the FPS programming/dynamic.  I do not understand the The "more rigid profession system we've switched to just doesn't lend itself to a skill system that's like what we had before.", reasoning at all. what advantage does lack of choice and individualization present/offer SOE to do this?






The answer here is it has the advantage of not being a min/max system. You won't end up with everyone being one particular combination in order to play pvp.

Obviously this is in *theory* in practice.. we ain't there yet.

Smed


 

 

For Christ Sakes Smedly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

 

I was a TKM/M.Commando pre-cu and not a (*&(*^(*&%*^$*^%#^&%$*&^&( deffense stacker, I had a great time in PvP I WAS A VIABLE PVP PLAYER.

now as an elder jedi i destroy everyone and it's boring, thanks

"Yeah ... if a major newspaper covers what you did in a patch, you probably did something wrong." (Slashdot.org)
03-24-2006 11:24 AM  

Report Abuse to a Moderator
 
Re: A bit of news around the SOE rumors and SWG
Options    Options  
topfuel
Squadron Leader
Posts: 4874
Registered: 06-15-2005


topfuel
PA: Tolmock Balopy
Server: Bria

Reply 453 of 3133

Viewed 5200 times




Smed wrote:


Altyrell wrote:

What is thy Bidding my MASTER (From the MIGHT OF THE ~MEOW~ to EMPEROR Smed)

  1. Could you say if the "Secret Project" that several (rough est. 95%) DEVs are working on, has anything to do with SWG?
  2. Will Smuggler's be able to Smuggle (i mean ACTUAL Smuggle)
  3. Are you going to get an "actual" SIG???
  4. CAPITOL SHIPS... What be ye Thoughts Admiral Smed
  5. What are your thoughts on this Idea: {PLUG: My idea for LS Crafting}??
  6. Any chance you could put in a "good" word for me, in the Galatic Senate Program?

 

Message Edited by Altyrell on 03-24-200609:57 AM






Secret Poject? Where do people come up with this stuff. ALL developers on SWG are focused on the publish plan you saw. We were in the preliminary planning/design stages of a design for an expansion pack a few months back. When we saw how much work the live game needed and the reaction from both the community and the focus groups we dropped those plans. We can worry about that later.

Smed


That would be from Dev Swede, Smed.

He confirmed he was taken off pilot to work on projects he can't talk about.

TOLMOCK BALOPY IS WATCHING.

Me = Sodapop
03-24-2006 11:25 AM  

Report Abuse to a Moderator
 
Re: A bit of news arround the SOE rumors and SWG
Options    Options  
Smed
Dev
Posts: 131
Registered: 05-03-2005



Reply 454 of 3133

Viewed 5220 times


We can only do our best to lay out the way we plan on doing things based on as much feedback as we can get from the community. If we don't live up to your expectations, we lose customers. All we can do is our best.

Smed
03-24-2006 11:25 AM  

Report Abuse to a Moderator
 
Re: A bit of news arround the SOE rumors and SWG
Options    Options  
H-I-M
Wing Commander
Posts: 1281
Registered: 07-17-2004


H-I-M
PA: MADD
Server: Tempest

Reply 455 of 3133

Viewed 5188 times




Smed wrote:


KrackenOne wrote:


Smed wrote:


RKO wrote:


Smed wrote:


jon_arner wrote:
i think you can answer this Smed:
 
will we ever see a lock on target system agen? Will we ever get a skill sytem simmular, or like the one we had before? And do you think this gaem feel like Star Wars?





1) No target lock is planned or being discussed.
2) There will be additional skills for each profession, but not like the system before. I realize this is contriversial but there it is.


Smed

man this game is never going to get better.

why can't you do these things?

Message Edited by RKO on 03-24-200609:26 AM






Why can't we do these things?

1) Target lock - Believe it or not we talked long and hard about this one. If you seriously sit down and think about the nature of the NGE style of combat, it means that people need to be able to use actual skill to hit. If you take that away you need to go back to the more turn based system we had before. It just plain wouldn't work. Now you can make a legitimate argument that we shouldn't use this style of combat. I have no defense against that argument because nearly every other MMO out there uses that style of combat and clearly it works. What we are trying to do here is create a new style of gameplay. Does it work? Well.. for some people it does, and for others it doesn't. That's the truth. For myself, I prefer it to the old combat system which I personally found dull. But that's just my personal opinion. The reality is we've changed to the new system and we're moving forward. It isn't that we can't add target locking.. it's that wer'e not going to because there isn't a way to do it that wouldn't reduce the skill level needed.

2) The more rigid profession system we've switched to just doesn't lend itself to a skill system that's like what we had before.

Smed

OK.... i understand the reasoning behind Target Lock and the FPS programming/dynamic.  I do not understand the The "more rigid profession system we've switched to just doesn't lend itself to a skill system that's like what we had before.", reasoning at all. what advantage does lack of choice and individualization present/offer SOE to do this?






The answer here is it has the advantage of not being a min/max system. You won't end up with everyone being one particular combination in order to play pvp.

Obviously this is in *theory* in practice.. we ain't there yet.

Smed

It was like that PreCU... not every one did the OMGOSH melee stacking...

Guess Who...
What Happened To The Game I Bought
I support a rollback and keeping & balancing the old combat system.
...and making SWG a better place to be.
Your voice counts!
--We go out and say, ‘'you know what, we want more of those players, we want that 3.5 million from that game over there.' So instead of sticking to the thing that our players really love, we start changing it. And now we’re alienating the players playing our game, losing our subscribers." - Jeff Hickmanstart
03-24-2006 11:25 AM  

Report Abuse to a Moderator
 
Re: A bit of news arround the SOE rumors and SWG   [ Edited ]
Options    Options  
RKO
Wing Commander
Posts: 3860
Registered: 01-03-2005


RKO
PA: CLAW
Server: Starsider

Reply 456 of 3133

Viewed 5189 times


this is your focus group right here, right now smed we all want a better game we don't just want you to hear us we want you to listen there is a difference

Message Edited by RKO on 03-24-200611:28 AM

WarStory

There are only five notes in the musical scale, but their variations are so many that that cannot all be heard. There are only five basic colors, but their variations are so many that they cannot all be seen. There are only five basic flavors, but their variations are so many they cannot all be tasted. There are only two kinds of charge in battle, the unorthodox surprise attack and the orthodox direct attack, but variations of the unorthodox and the orthodox are endless. The unorthodox and the orthodox give rise to each other, like a beginningless circle- The Art of War by Sun Tzu
03-24-2006 11:25 AM  

Report Abuse to a Moderator
 
Re: A bit of news arround the SOE rumors and SWG
Options    Options  
jalia
Wing Commander
Posts: 2173
Registered: 03-29-2004


jalia

Reply 457 of 3133

Viewed 5185 times




Smed wrote:


Why can't we do these things?

1) Target lock - Believe it or not we talked long and hard about this one. If you seriously sit down and think about the nature of the NGE style of combat, it means that people need to be able to use actual skill to hit. If you take that away you need to go back to the more turn based system we had before. It just plain wouldn't work. Now you can make a legitimate argument that we shouldn't use this style of combat. I have no defense against that argument because nearly every other MMO out there uses that style of combat and clearly it works. What we are trying to do here is create a new style of gameplay. Does it work? Well.. for some people it does, and for others it doesn't. That's the truth. For myself, I prefer it to the old combat system which I personally found dull. But that's just my personal opinion. The reality is we've changed to the new system and we're moving forward. It isn't that we can't add target locking.. it's that wer'e not going to because there isn't a way to do it that wouldn't reduce the skill level needed.

2) The more rigid profession system we've switched to just doesn't lend itself to a skill system that's like what we had before.

Smed

 
I call shenanigans!
 
Have you seen DDO yet? 
(Of course you have - the NGE seems cobbled together from a peek at DDO beta, but that's another discussion)
DDO has target lock and real-time combat working seamlessly together.
How do they do this?  PROPER COLLISION DETECTION
Is it 'turn based' in the backround, sure, so is the NGE, in the backround, you just won't show up the combat logs.
DDO still requires that exact 'skill to hit' you are talking about. In fact it MORE ACCURATELY integrates with your own skill.
 
Target lock occurs but IN NO WAY hinders real-time combat.
Lets see, you have to be in proper range, have to face your target and have to actually make contact with the weapon.
So far so good. All target lock does is allow us to stay properly focused on our target. That's it. Understand?
It doesn't aim for us. It doesn't have to allow any other functionality to be helpful.
it doesn't defy real-time combat.
 
We were told that within appx. 6 months of the NGE launch there would be collision detection implemented.
We were told that it might take 6 months to properly map all the surfaces for collision detection.
It was hailed as the one thing that woudl truly make the NGE shine when it was finished.
The NGE is broken without it.
 
All other topics aside, the NGE isn't finished yet, and that was made clear in the days surrounding it's release.
 
Now explain to me in technical terms why target lock won't work and when the heck we will see full collision detection.
 
Please. With sugar on top?
 
I haven't been able to stomach playing SWG lately with all the holes and unresolved promises and loose ends.
How much longer can I keep my last two accounts active in a game I dont play.
We will both find out soon, won't we?
 
 
 

____________________________________________

Jalia Tresko | Following her destiny...
Juli'ana | Medical Field Tactician
Jundan Tresko | Mayor, SYN City, Talus
Bria Native| Born & Raised, Here to the last breath
____________________________________________
03-24-2006 11:25 AM  

Report Abuse to a Moderator
 
Re: A bit of news arround the SOE rumors and SWG
Options    Options  
gotslapped
Jedi
Posts: 554
Registered: 09-18-2003


gotslapped

Reply 458 of 3133

Viewed 5177 times




sabotage wrote:


Sorry man, not QUITE right.

 

I like all the other characters who have been logging in to talk to us. (The actual Devs) But, Tiggs posted about 2000 times more then every person (now) combined!

 

I MISS Tiggs!



... and she still got constantly flamed.  Nothing will satisfy the community.  Absolutely nothing.  My issue isn't with SOE, its with the "darned if you do, darned if you don't" community that pressures SOE to make radical changes or submit to nerf calls, whines, and outrages.  I wonder if we will be remembered as the worst community in MMO history.
03-24-2006 11:26 AM  

Report Abuse to a Moderator
 
Re: A bit of news arround the SOE rumors and SWG
Options    Options  
gladiatory2k
Wing Commander
Posts: 1727
Registered: 05-11-2004


gladiatory2k
PA: -CDA-
Server: Tempest

Reply 459 of 3133

Viewed 5179 times




Smed wrote:


KrackenOne wrote:


Smed wrote:


RKO wrote:


Smed wrote:


jon_arner wrote:
i think you can answer this Smed:
 
will we ever see a lock on target system agen? Will we ever get a skill sytem simmular, or like the one we had before? And do you think this gaem feel like Star Wars?





1) No target lock is planned or being discussed.
2) There will be additional skills for each profession, but not like the system before. I realize this is contriversial but there it is.


Smed

man this game is never going to get better.

why can't you do these things?

Message Edited by RKO on 03-24-200609:26 AM






Why can't we do these things?

1) Target lock - Believe it or not we talked long and hard about this one. If you seriously sit down and think about the nature of the NGE style of combat, it means that people need to be able to use actual skill to hit. If you take that away you need to go back to the more turn based system we had before. It just plain wouldn't work. Now you can make a legitimate argument that we shouldn't use this style of combat. I have no defense against that argument because nearly every other MMO out there uses that style of combat and clearly it works. What we are trying to do here is create a new style of gameplay. Does it work? Well.. for some people it does, and for others it doesn't. That's the truth. For myself, I prefer it to the old combat system which I personally found dull. But that's just my personal opinion. The reality is we've changed to the new system and we're moving forward. It isn't that we can't add target locking.. it's that wer'e not going to because there isn't a way to do it that wouldn't reduce the skill level needed.

2) The more rigid profession system we've switched to just doesn't lend itself to a skill system that's like what we had before.

Smed

OK.... i understand the reasoning behind Target Lock and the FPS programming/dynamic.  I do not understand the The "more rigid profession system we've switched to just doesn't lend itself to a skill system that's like what we had before.", reasoning at all. what advantage does lack of choice and individualization present/offer SOE to do this?






The answer here is it has the advantage of not being a min/max system. You won't end up with everyone being one particular combination in order to play pvp.

Obviously this is in *theory* in practice.. we ain't there yet.

Smed

that's funny, instead you come up against 6 professions in pvp. To be honest, yeah there were flavor of the month templates before, but that didn't mean that EVERYONE had the same template. I knew a TKM that was quite effective against Pre-cu Jedi. I knew a carbineer that would be deadly with the states he laid down, one guild on our server showed the benefit of a talented Squad leader in PVP. You played to your desires and you played what was right for you. Pre-nge this was even truer, NGE just killed this diversity. It was up to you if you knew how to win. I had a fight with a bounty hunter that lasted an hour while we were working each other down, now the fights last 3 mins tops. Not very fun PVPwise.

................................................
Reverand Doctor G. Flex has spoken


Gla D'a'tir - Tempest Jedi
Bartholemew Androlux - Tempest Droid Engineer/Shipwright - Visit Androlux shipyards on Corellia (-347, -5838)
03-24-2006 11:26 AM  

Report Abuse to a Moderator
 
Re: A bit of news arround the SOE rumors and SWG
Options    Options  
emovamalla
Descrambler
Posts: 2007
Registered: 09-16-2004


emovamalla
PA: -TPS-
Server: Bria

Reply 460 of 3133

Viewed 5173 times


SMED, I don't have much of a gripe as I do a praise.
 
THANK YOU for EQ2.  I get my multi-class, cross buffing, turn-style, target-locked, crafting-driven, RPG emersion that I (and others) am looking for.  SWG is almost 100% dead to me because it now lacks all those components. 
 
Please, don't ever think about turning EQ2 into an NGE style system or else SOE will implode.

Foginock ~ 12pt Master Architect ~ 12pt Master WS ~ 12pt Master Artisan
Haciv ~ Master Powers ~ 4440 Defender ~ 3002 Enhancer ~ 4000 Healer
Vicah ~ Master BH ~ Master Pistoleer ~ 4000 CM

03-24-2006 11:26 AM  

Report Abuse to a Moderator
 
Re: A bit of news around the SOE rumors and SWG   [ Edited ]
Options    Options  
Kcocemag
Descrambler
Posts: 1130
Registered: 07-11-2004


Kcocemag

Reply 461 of 3133

Viewed 5151 times




Smed wrote:


Altyrell wrote:

What is thy Bidding my MASTER (From the MIGHT OF THE ~MEOW~ to EMPEROR Smed)

  1. Could you say if the "Secret Project" that several (rough est. 95%) DEVs are working on, has anything to do with SWG?
  2. Will Smuggler's be able to Smuggle (i mean ACTUAL Smuggle)
  3. Are you going to get an "actual" SIG???
  4. CAPITOL SHIPS... What be ye Thoughts Admiral Smed
  5. What are your thoughts on this Idea: {PLUG: My idea for LS Crafting}??
  6. Any chance you could put in a "good" word for me, in the Galatic Senate Program?

 

Message Edited by Altyrell on 03-24-200609:57 AM






Secret Poject? Where do people come up with this stuff. ALL developers on SWG are focused on the publish plan you saw. We were in the preliminary planning/design stages of a design for an expansion pack a few months back. When we saw how much work the live game needed and the reaction from both the community and the focus groups we dropped those plans. We can worry about that later.

Smed


We came up with it from your own fricken devs! Go read one of the last posts Swede made, your answer lies there.

Message Edited by Kcocemag on 03-24-200602:27 PM


...................
= Rups Kcocemag =
...................
=Clubbing baby Ewoks since 1985=
...................
If you can read this, then you don't need glasses.

03-24-2006 11:26 AM  

Report Abuse to a Moderator
 
Re: A bit of news arround the SOE rumors and SWG
Options    Options  
H-I-M
Wing Commander
Posts: 1281
Registered: 07-17-2004


H-I-M
PA: MADD
Server: Tempest

Reply 462 of 3133

Viewed 5152 times




Smed wrote:
We can only do our best to lay out the way we plan on doing things based on as much feedback as we can get from the community. If we don't live up to your expectations, we lose customers. All we can do is our best.

Smed

**edit**

Guess Who...
What Happened To The Game I Bought
I support a rollback and keeping & balancing the old combat system.
...and making SWG a better place to be.
Your voice counts!
--We go out and say, ‘'you know what, we want more of those players, we want that 3.5 million from that game over there.' So instead of sticking to the thing that our players really love, we start changing it. And now we’re alienating the players playing our game, losing our subscribers." - Jeff Hickmanstart
03-24-2006 11:26 AM  

Report Abuse to a Moderator
 
Re: A bit of news arround the SOE rumors and SWG
Options    Options  
BoFa-ST
Jedi
Posts: 5573
Registered: 01-03-2004


BoFa-ST
PA: RoH|DE
Server: Chilastra

Reply 463 of 3133

Viewed 5145 times




Smed wrote:


Distiler wrote:
"I'm going to call you out on this - I'm going to say you are flat out incorrect on this. Our communication has been terrific. I can't say you neccessarily like what we've been saying, but I think our community people and our devs have been much more active than before. I never liked that system of correspondents before (they did a great job..don't get me wrong) but I prefer direct communication.

Smed"

Who is giving you the reports about how is community going ? cause it's really lying to you.
Salute.




The truth is the community morale won't improve until the game does. Communication can't fix this. Improvements to the game can. The fact is our communication has improved.. people don't neccessarily like the message is all. I get that. So do our community folks. My preference is that all the posts in the gameplay forum are discussing gameplay balance.. and in-game issues.. but they won't until we get the game to a baseline fun level. We're not there yet. We know that. We're working to fix it. There is no other answer.

Smed

there is a HUGE problem with the main man ackknowldgeing these issues, yet... its still a pay to play game.

you are admitting its 'beta' but this is a 3 year old live game.

you guys dug your hole, but now its up to us to tell you how to dig out of it? sorry, im not gettin paid here, im paying. YOU are gettin paid. you figure it out. btw: nge sucks dood. you had a game ppl could play for hours a day. now... 10-20min to say 'hi' to anyone arond.

you are still in semi denial regarding 'feking up' a good game. im sure you knew it was risky, but when do you admit it backfired?

.......NBoFa DeezN.......
guild first; faction second; truth third
..............Upia..............

03-24-2006 11:26 AM  

Report Abuse to a Moderator
 
Re: A bit of news around the SOE rumors and SWG
Options    Options  
Heswindu
Galactic Senator
Posts: 1891
Registered: 06-26-2003


Heswindu
PA: The Crescent Order
Server: Chilastra

Reply 464 of 3133

Viewed 5135 times




Smed wrote:


Altyrell wrote:

What is thy Bidding my MASTER (From the MIGHT OF THE ~MEOW~ to EMPEROR Smed)

  1. Could you say if the "Secret Project" that several (rough est. 95%) DEVs are working on, has anything to do with SWG?
  2. Will Smuggler's be able to Smuggle (i mean ACTUAL Smuggle)
  3. Are you going to get an "actual" SIG???
  4. CAPITOL SHIPS... What be ye Thoughts Admiral Smed
  5. What are your thoughts on this Idea: {PLUG: My idea for LS Crafting}??
  6. Any chance you could put in a "good" word for me, in the Galatic Senate Program?

 

Message Edited by Altyrell on 03-24-200609:57 AM






Secret Poject? Where do people come up with this stuff. ALL developers on SWG are focused on the publish plan you saw. We were in the preliminary planning/design stages of a design for an expansion pack a few months back. When we saw how much work the live game needed and the reaction from both the community and the focus groups we dropped those plans. We can worry about that later.

Smed


Smed, I think he's referring to devs like SWG-Swede who have been reassigned to a SWG related project he can't talk about yet.

In any case, thank you for answering these questions and being frank about them, this type of communication goes a long way.  I have to admit your top 5 is right on, and that's exactly where the focus needs to be.

One thing I am extremely disappointed about is that there is no expansion coming....I really really really wanted cap ships



||||| Zane Falkin | Varis Falkin |||||
___________________________________________
Commando - [ The Crescent Order ] - Jedi Knight
EDY Industries | 12 Pt WS | 12 Pt Chassis, 17 Pt Weapons & Engines Shipwright | DE
//// Tsarin, Talus 5379 -2500 \\\\



03-24-2006 11:26 AM  

Report Abuse to a Moderator
 
Re: A bit of news arround the SOE rumors and SWG
Options    Options  
Gothywench
Jedi
Posts: 6307
Registered: 07-28-2003


Gothywench

Reply 465 of 3133

Viewed 5135 times




MajorXP wrote:
Smed-


Will you comment on not having an SWG Fan Fest or including us in the SOE Fan Fest?


/




I will. SWG is owned by Lucas Arts, not SOE. Therefore, Lucas Arts will decide if there is a Fan Fest. It is a joint vent, put on by both companies. The SOE Fan Faire is an event for SOE owned games; hence SWG would be disqualified.

That being said...are we going to have a Fan Fest? Can ya poke the folks at LA and give an update? I had such a good time at the last time!


Gorath: Sti-fi Osp-ro - Domestics Trader
Gorath: Honeewoo - Master Entertainer
Kettemoor: Honeewoo - Master Entertainer
Kettemoor: Yohai Darksun - Master Entertainer

Player Spotlight 6/30/06
03-24-2006 11:26 AM  

Report Abuse to a Moderator
Jump to Page:   « · 27 · 28 · 29 · 30 · 31 · 32 · 33 · 34 · 35 · »  |  Next Page